There is a difference between the two. Pro Choice means you have a choice to choose life or death. Pro Abortion means you are for Abortion by any means necessary.
Even most Pro Choice people would not support the killing of a life born child during an abortion attempt. I would guess that almost every Pro Choice person would not support the killing of a child in the 7th, 8th, or even 9th month of pregnancy, as clearly a child born at this time of the pregnancy is a viable life. I would go so far as to believe that Pro Choice people would not support the CLONING of embryos for the purpose of stem cell research.
Well all of these thoughts that I have listed are actually thoughts that Obama has with relation to Pro Choice, to this I say, he is not Pro Choice, He is PRO ABORTION
He wants to fund Abortions, Stem Cell research that uses cloned embryos, while taking away funding for programs that offer choices to pregnant women and research that would allow for alternative scientific methods for developing cells for stem cell research
From the cited link below with regards to stem cell research:
"But Obama would not stop there. He has co-sponsored a bill-strongly opposed by McCain-that would authorize the large-scale industrial production of human embryos for use in biomedical research in which they would be killed. In fact, the bill Obama co-sponsored would effectively require the killing of human beings in the embryonic stage that were produced by cloning. It would make it a federal crime for a woman to save an embryo by agreeing to have the tiny developing human being implanted in her womb so that he or she could be brought to term. This ''clone and kill'' bill would, if enacted, bring something to America that has heretofore existed only in China-the equivalent of legally mandated abortion. In an audacious act of deceit, Obama and his co-sponsorsmisleadingly call this ananti-cloning bill. But it is nothing of the kind. What it bans is not cloning, but allowing the embryonic children produced by cloning to survive
But when a bill was introduced in the United States Senate to put a modest amount of federal money into research to develop these methods, Barack Obama was one of the few senators who opposed it. From any rational vantage point, this is unconscionable. Why would someone not wish to find a method of producing the pluripotent cells scientists want that all Americans could enthusiastically endorse? Why create and kill human embryos when there are alternativesthat do not require the taking of nascent human lives? It is as if Obama is opposed to stem-cell research unless it involves killing human embryos. "
http://thepublicdiscourse.com/viewarticle.php?selectedarticle=2008.10.14_George_Robert_Obama's%20Abortion%20Extremism_.xml
This man is crazy at the very least and very, very, dangerous at the most. Personally, i say he is the most dangerous man in our country in my life time.
0 comments:
Post a Comment